独家
NCLAT拒绝临时救济谷歌的93.6亿卢比CCI Playstore订单
NCLAT同意在4月17日对谷歌进行听证，并要求科技巨头在四周内将CCI罚款的10%存入NCLAT登记处。
NCLAT同意在4月17日听取谷歌的意见，并要求这家科技巨头存入10%的资金CCI细与NCLAT登记处联系。
谷歌已经接触NCLAT，寻求暂停93.6亿卢比的罚款，以及CCI的指示，要求该公司停止在Play商店中的滥用行为。
案件的核心是谷歌Play商店的一项政策，该政策要求应用程序开发者独占使用谷歌播放的计费系统（交换容量)查阅所有客户帐单。
这个系统不仅要用于接收来自应用程序的付款，还要用于客户在应用程序内进行的购买。任何不使用GPBS的应用程序开发者都不允许在谷歌Play商店中列出他的产品。
整个案件始于2020年，当时谷歌对所有Play Store交易征收30%的佣金。此举受到了全球和印度应用程序开发者的严厉批评，称其扼杀了竞争。
一群应用程序开发者，除了匹配组(Tinder等约会网站的所有者)向反垄断机构提起了投诉，该机构开始调查谷歌的佣金角度，以及谷歌在计费过程中是否屏蔽了竞争对手的支付方式。
最近，NCLAT要求谷歌印度缴纳133.7亿卢比罚款的10%印度竞争委员会(CCI)以滥用支配地位的罪名起诉，同时拒绝批准暂缓执行竞争监管机构施加的全部处罚。
NCLAT允许Micromax和Karbonn宣誓书支持谷歌立场
国家公司法上诉法庭周二指示在周四列出请愿书，届时将决定他们的请求是否会被接受在针对印度竞争委员会(CCI)命令的案件中举行听证会。
![\"NCLAT](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/figure>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT<\/a>) on Wednesday denied interim relief to Google<\/a> in its appeal against the second CCI order penalising the tech giant for Rs 936 crore on abuse of its dominant position in Play Store policies.The NCLAT agreed to hear Google on April 17 and asked the tech giant to deposit 10% of the CCI fine<\/a> with the NCLAT registry within four weeks.
Google had approached the NCLAT seeking a stay on the Rs 936 crore fine as well as CCI's directions that have asked the company to cease and desist from abusive practices in the Play Store.
<\/div><\/div>On October 25, the CCI imposed a penalty of Rs 936.44 crore on Google and issued a cease-and-desist order in which the regulator prescribed eight corrective measures that Google Play needs to implement to correct the anti-competitive practices.
At the core of the case is a policy of Google Play store that requires app developers to exclusively use Google Play's Billing System<\/a> (GPBS<\/a>) for all customer billings.
This system has to be used not only for receiving payments from the apps but also for in-app purchases made by customers. Any App developer who doesn\u2019t use GPBS is not allowed to list his product on the Google Play store.
The whole case began in 2020 when Google enforced a 30% commission for all Play Store transactions. The move was heavily criticised by app developers globally and in India for stifling competition.
A group of app developers, in addition to Match Group<\/a> (owner of dating sites such as Tinder), filed a complaint with the antitrust body, which began probing the commissions angle and if Google was blocking rival payment options in its billing process.
Recently, the NCLAT asked Google India to deposit 10% of the Rs 1,337 crore penalty imposed on it by the Competition Commission of India<\/a> (CCI) for abuse of dominance, while refusing to grant a stay on the entirety of the penalty imposed by the competition regulator.
At the core of the case is a policy of Google Play store that requires app developers to exclusively use Google Play's Billing System<\/a> (GPBS<\/a>) for all customer billings.
This system has to be used not only for receiving payments from the apps but also for in-app purchases made by customers. Any App developer who doesn\u2019t use GPBS is not allowed to list his product on the Google Play store.
The whole case began in 2020 when Google enforced a 30% commission for all Play Store transactions. The move was heavily criticised by app developers globally and in India for stifling competition.
A group of app developers, in addition to Match Group<\/a> (owner of dating sites such as Tinder), filed a complaint with the antitrust body, which began probing the commissions angle and if Google was blocking rival payment options in its billing process.
Recently, the NCLAT asked Google India to deposit 10% of the Rs 1,337 crore penalty imposed on it by the Competition Commission of India<\/a> (CCI) for abuse of dominance, while refusing to grant a stay on the entirety of the penalty imposed by the competition regulator.
<\/div><\/div>The CCI had on October 20 imposed a fine of Rs 1,337 crore on Google for abuse of its dominant position in Android mobile device markets.