独家
点可能会寻求法律部门意见给实体频谱
官员意识到细节说点会问如果频谱可以管理或通过拍卖。虽然内阁已经批准直接分配企业2022年6月,它没有清楚周围的具体方法。“我们将寻求清晰的法律部门。
的电信部(点)可能会寻求法律意见的部门分配的频谱为推出私人垄断企业网络。
官员意识到细节说点会问如果频谱可以管理或通过拍卖。虽然内阁已经批准直接分配企业2022年6月,它没有清楚周围的具体方法。“我们将寻求清晰的法律部门。根据2012年的最高法院订单,分配频谱拍卖的首选方法是用于商业目的。虽然私人网络不允许给商业电信服务,我们必须确保我们不要对apex法院命令,”一位官员告诉等。
直接的频谱分配企业的问题一直是有争议的,推销技术公司对电信运营商。
电信公司反对任何直接分配,声称它会扭曲了公平竞争的环境,给技术球员后门入口提供5 g服务企业。科技公司希望光谱直接从政府建立人工网络,说企业应该不需要依赖于电信公司。
根据初步指南发布的私人网络点,企业要建立自己的俘虏网络可以租赁光谱从电信运营商或直接从点。他们也可以问电信运营商推出他们的私人网络。
点似乎在这个问题上谨慎路线的喜欢的依赖Jio和Bharti Airtel对塔塔集团。
“此事将像滚雪球一样越来越大并最终引发争议如果后来事实证明私人网络受益商业通过频谱管理分配,而不是拍卖,”另一位官员说。
早些时候曾报道,等公司印孚瑟斯Larsen & Toubro公司GMR,塔塔塔塔电力和通讯申请点寻求直接分配的频谱,其中包括mid-band (3300 - 3670 MHz),私人网络。这些应用程序是在回应一个运动发起点测试对频谱的需求建立专用网络。
“频谱为私人网络需要在选择位置,所以拍卖专用相当荒谬的和低效的。我们已经把拍卖与透明度,但在现实中,只有一种方法确保透明度”,电信咨询公司主任Mahesh Uppal说Com(印度)Pvt Ltd。”,最高法院本身澄清以后,拍卖不是宪法原则和在所有情况下可能不合适。”
电信行业的交涉政府此前曾表示,允许直接频谱分配企业会损害电信行业的财务状况。强调他们是最有能力设置俘虏自己私人网络,电信公司表示,企业服务预计将占30 - 40%的行业的5 g的收入。因此,直接分配频谱企业可能损害该行业的收入来自服务使用下一代技术。移动运营商也指出,分配频谱直接将法律上站不住脚的,在2012年最高法院的命令后,将拍卖的模式分配稀缺的自然资源。
官员意识到细节说点会问如果频谱可以管理或通过拍卖。虽然内阁已经批准直接分配企业2022年6月,它没有清楚周围的具体方法。“我们将寻求清晰的法律部门。根据2012年的最高法院订单,分配频谱拍卖的首选方法是用于商业目的。虽然私人网络不允许给商业电信服务,我们必须确保我们不要对apex法院命令,”一位官员告诉等。
直接的频谱分配企业的问题一直是有争议的,推销技术公司对电信运营商。
电信公司反对任何直接分配,声称它会扭曲了公平竞争的环境,给技术球员后门入口提供5 g服务企业。科技公司希望光谱直接从政府建立人工网络,说企业应该不需要依赖于电信公司。
根据初步指南发布的私人网络点,企业要建立自己的俘虏网络可以租赁光谱从电信运营商或直接从点。他们也可以问电信运营商推出他们的私人网络。
点似乎在这个问题上谨慎路线的喜欢的依赖Jio和Bharti Airtel对塔塔集团。
“此事将像滚雪球一样越来越大并最终引发争议如果后来事实证明私人网络受益商业通过频谱管理分配,而不是拍卖,”另一位官员说。
早些时候曾报道,等公司印孚瑟斯Larsen & Toubro公司GMR,塔塔塔塔电力和通讯申请点寻求直接分配的频谱,其中包括mid-band (3300 - 3670 MHz),私人网络。这些应用程序是在回应一个运动发起点测试对频谱的需求建立专用网络。
沃达丰想法面临点的运营和财务检查
同时,政府不愿接公司的股本(内阁已经批准的),其股价已经下跌在Rs 10(收于Rs 7。周五85,在过去的六个月里下降了7%)。公司的董事会提供政府股份的票面价值每股10卢比,基于政府让所有的金融计算关于其入境(大约33%的股权)。
“频谱为私人网络需要在选择位置,所以拍卖专用相当荒谬的和低效的。我们已经把拍卖与透明度,但在现实中,只有一种方法确保透明度”,电信咨询公司主任Mahesh Uppal说Com(印度)Pvt Ltd。”,最高法院本身澄清以后,拍卖不是宪法原则和在所有情况下可能不合适。”
电信行业的交涉政府此前曾表示,允许直接频谱分配企业会损害电信行业的财务状况。强调他们是最有能力设置俘虏自己私人网络,电信公司表示,企业服务预计将占30 - 40%的行业的5 g的收入。因此,直接分配频谱企业可能损害该行业的收入来自服务使用下一代技术。移动运营商也指出,分配频谱直接将法律上站不住脚的,在2012年最高法院的命令后,将拍卖的模式分配稀缺的自然资源。
The Department of Telecommunications<\/a> (DoT<\/a>) is likely to seek the opinion of the law ministry over allocation of spectrum to enterprises for rolling out private captive networks.
Officials aware of the details said the DoT will ask if spectrum can be given administratively or through auction. While the Cabinet had approved direct allocation to enterprises in June 2022, it had not spelled out the specifics around the methodology. \"We will seek clarity from the law ministry. As per the 2012 Supreme Court<\/a> order, auction is the preferred way for allocating spectrum for commercial purposes. Though private networks are not allowed to give commercial telecom services, we must be sure that we don't fall against the apex court order,\" an official told ET.
The issue of direct allocation of spectrum to enterprises has been a contentious one, pitching technology firms against telecom operators.
Officials aware of the details said the DoT will ask if spectrum can be given administratively or through auction. While the Cabinet had approved direct allocation to enterprises in June 2022, it had not spelled out the specifics around the methodology. \"We will seek clarity from the law ministry. As per the 2012 Supreme Court<\/a> order, auction is the preferred way for allocating spectrum for commercial purposes. Though private networks are not allowed to give commercial telecom services, we must be sure that we don't fall against the apex court order,\" an official told ET.
The issue of direct allocation of spectrum to enterprises has been a contentious one, pitching technology firms against telecom operators.
<\/div><\/div>![\"DoT](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/figure>
Telcos<\/a> have opposed any direct allocation alleging that it would distort the level playing field and give technology players a backdoor entry to provide 5G services to enterprises. Tech companies want spectrum directly from the government for setting up captive networks, saying enterprises should not need to depend on telcos.
According to the initial guidelines on private networks released by the DoT, enterprises that want to set up their own captive networks can lease spectrum from telecom operators or get it directly from DoT. They can also ask telecom operators to roll out their private networks.
The DoT appears to be taking the ultra-cautious route in this matter which has pitted the likes of Reliance Jio<\/a> and Bharti Airtel<\/a> against the Tata Group<\/a>.
\"The matter could snowball into a controversy if at a later stage it turns out that private networks benefitted commercially by getting spectrum administratively allocated instead of auction,\" another official said.
ET had earlier reported that companies such as Infosys<\/a>, GMR, Larsen & Toubro, Tata Power and Tata Communications<\/a> had applied to the DoT seeking direct allocation of spectrum, including in the mid-band (3,300-3,670 MHz), for private networks. These applications were filed in response to an exercise launched by the DoT to test the demand for spectrum to set up private networks.
<\/figure>Telcos<\/a> have opposed any direct allocation alleging that it would distort the level playing field and give technology players a backdoor entry to provide 5G services to enterprises. Tech companies want spectrum directly from the government for setting up captive networks, saying enterprises should not need to depend on telcos.
According to the initial guidelines on private networks released by the DoT, enterprises that want to set up their own captive networks can lease spectrum from telecom operators or get it directly from DoT. They can also ask telecom operators to roll out their private networks.
The DoT appears to be taking the ultra-cautious route in this matter which has pitted the likes of Reliance Jio<\/a> and Bharti Airtel<\/a> against the Tata Group<\/a>.
\"The matter could snowball into a controversy if at a later stage it turns out that private networks benefitted commercially by getting spectrum administratively allocated instead of auction,\" another official said.
ET had earlier reported that companies such as Infosys<\/a>, GMR, Larsen & Toubro, Tata Power and Tata Communications<\/a> had applied to the DoT seeking direct allocation of spectrum, including in the mid-band (3,300-3,670 MHz), for private networks. These applications were filed in response to an exercise launched by the DoT to test the demand for spectrum to set up private networks.
<\/div><\/div>