独家
与Jio Airtel,沃达丰想法5 g私有网络,无线电设备:Mavenir
“大规模采用还没有发生这是正确的,并有多个原因。第一个被部署早些时候发生在国家安全局(非独立)模式。所以,带来一个新的载体和国家安全局意味着你需要与现有的球员交织在一起。直到现在,额外的接口测试并未真正发生在多个帐户。现在我们正在经历的一级账户在美国。这是一个一级账户在欧洲,我们所做的初步验证,“Pankajakshan说。
开跑或者打开无线接入网络供应商Mavenir,一个总部位于美国的跨国公司,是乐观的市场前景和规模印度市场,并说它与现任电信运营商合作依赖Jio,Bharti Airtel和沃达丰的想法。在一个交互ETTelecom Muntazir乐动娱乐招聘阿巴斯的Bejoy Pankajakshan,公司的首席技术和战略官(CTSO)谈判开跑,下一代技术,5 g私有网络,本地制造。编辑摘录。
这个有多大5 g的机会你在印度吗?
我们想利用这里的技能的人。印度规模。我们已经开始在印度制造的收音机。我们有一个重要的研发基地在班加罗尔,浦那和孟买。
我们可以匹配的TCO和成本是相同的,有自动化和头痛是移除,这非常私人网络。这是一个更有效的为企业使用一个开放的解决方案,因为你减少了数量的设备坐在框架。
是你的生产计划通过一个合作伙伴?你的ODM的合作伙伴是谁?
我们有一个ODM的合作伙伴。它不像Mavenir在制造;我们有一个ODM的关系。他们会制造。就像诺基亚和爱立信他们有odm。每个人都使用odm。这些球员在这个空间。我们使用相同的设置在印度制造。
从全球范围来看,我们没有看到任何大规模采用开跑?
大规模的采用还没有发生这是事实,有多种原因。第一个被部署早些时候发生在国家安全局(非独立)模式。所以,带来一个新的载体和国家安全局意味着你需要与现有的球员交织在一起。直到现在,额外的接口测试并未真正发生在多个帐户。现在我们正在经历的一级账户在美国。这是一个一级账户在欧洲,我们所做的初步验证。
当你觉得诺基亚的索赔或其他人声称他们开跑,他们还没有打开无线电基础panel-like Mavenir。没有其他的市场,达到这样的规模。如果我们证明这个在印度,印度的成本结构和规模,印度,印度需要的特性集,这不仅仅是5克,4 g, 2 g技术,那么它可以在任何市场在全球范围内工作。
Mavenir发射CPaaS通信服务提供者
Mavenir表示,其CPaaS提供可以使csp扩展他们的能力提供多渠道mobile-native消息传递等丰富的通信服务(RCS)对谷歌业务消息,苹果消息业务,短信和彩信功能。
全球电信运营商,甚至在印度不会冒任何风险,因为他们不想担心网络方面。你是如何应对这一挑战吗?
所以今天我们工作与第三方系统集成商,但我们作为系统集成,因为如果你看糊涂事正在发生,我们会先做。
你与Bharti Airtel接触的性质是什么?
我们现在正在做的事情与他们合作。这不是在同一规模几个其他的供应商在做什么,但他们肯定正开放运行解决方案。我们会将它部署到几个网站。
你认为这将导致一个商业之间的过渡Mavenir和附近的旅馆吗?
这是双方的期望。为什么你会继续做试验最终进入业务以外的任何其他目的。
电信满意试验到目前为止吗?
工作开始。他们在一段时间内所做的试验。你知道我们展示了电信部门(点)。现在实际上是把它,验证,并得到响应。我的意思是,如果你考虑经营者的角度来看,一旦确认,你可以复制它在任意数量的网站。与印度,有这么多卷,你总是会找到好尺寸。
所以你看到牵引Bharti Airtel以外任何电信吗?有依赖Jio和沃达丰的想法也在印度市场?
我们正在与所有三个运营商。我们在讨论在私人网络与所有的球员机会,小细胞和收音机。与沃达丰印度,我们已经有一个很强的关系,包的核心。我们携带大量的交通网络。下一个越来越开放了,我们在讨论。
Mavenir在印度的员工是什么?
全球大约有6000名员工。在印度,我相信这个数字增加到4000。它的一个重要基础和发展发生在印度。
![\"In](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/figure>Open RAN<\/a> or open radio access network vendor Mavenir<\/a>, a US-based multinational, is optimistic about the market prospects and scale of the India market, and said that it is working together with incumbent telecom operators \u2013 Reliance Jio<\/a>, Bharti Airtel<\/a> and Vodafone Idea<\/a>. In an interaction with ETTelecom\u2019s Muntazir Abbas, Bejoy Pankajakshan<\/strong>, company\u2019s Chief Technology and Strategy Officer <\/strong>(CTSO<\/strong>) talks on Open RAN, next generation technology, 5G private network, and local manufacturing. Edited excerpts.
How big is this 5G opportunity<\/a> for you in India?<\/strong>
We want to leverage the skill sets in people here. India gives the scale. We have started the manufacturing in India of our radios. We have a significant base of R&D here in Bengaluru, Pune and Mumbai.
<\/div><\/div>How do you see 5G private as an opportunity for Open RAN?<\/strong>
We can match the TCO and the cost is the same, the automation is there and their headaches are removed, which is very much there in terms of private networks. It\u2019s a lot more efficient for the enterprise to use an Open RAN solution because you are minimizing the amount of equipment sitting on the frame.
Is your manufacturing initiative through a partner? Who is your ODM partner?
<\/strong>
We have an ODM partner. It\u2019s not like Mavenir is doing the manufacturing; we have an ODM relationship. They will do the manufacturing. Just like Nokia<\/a> and Ericsson<\/a> they have the ODMs. Everybody uses ODMs. These kinds of players are playing in this space. We leverage the same setup to do manufacturing in India.
Globally, we are not seeing any large-scale adoption of Open RAN?<\/strong>
Large-scale adoption has not happened which is true, and there are multiple reasons for that. The first being the earlier deployments that happened have been with NSA (non standalone) mode. So to bring in a new carrier and NSA means you need to interwork with an existing player. And up until now, the extra interface testing has not really happened in multiple accounts. Now we're going through that with the tier 1 account in the US. It's a tier 1 account in Europe where we have done initial validation.
We can match the TCO and the cost is the same, the automation is there and their headaches are removed, which is very much there in terms of private networks. It\u2019s a lot more efficient for the enterprise to use an Open RAN solution because you are minimizing the amount of equipment sitting on the frame.
Is your manufacturing initiative through a partner? Who is your ODM partner?
<\/strong>
We have an ODM partner. It\u2019s not like Mavenir is doing the manufacturing; we have an ODM relationship. They will do the manufacturing. Just like Nokia<\/a> and Ericsson<\/a> they have the ODMs. Everybody uses ODMs. These kinds of players are playing in this space. We leverage the same setup to do manufacturing in India.
Globally, we are not seeing any large-scale adoption of Open RAN?<\/strong>
Large-scale adoption has not happened which is true, and there are multiple reasons for that. The first being the earlier deployments that happened have been with NSA (non standalone) mode. So to bring in a new carrier and NSA means you need to interwork with an existing player. And up until now, the extra interface testing has not really happened in multiple accounts. Now we're going through that with the tier 1 account in the US. It's a tier 1 account in Europe where we have done initial validation.
<\/div><\/div>That way we could do testing and are not limited by only doing a SA (standalone) deployment. So that costs an initial delay in actually getting this on a larger scale. The other piece is, of course, the availability of radios. The availability of radios that meet the different requirements. That's why we got into the whole open beam. So between us, NEC and Fujitsu and other players, now we can have enough presence in the market to actually give open RAN-based radios.
When you think of the Nokia claims or somebody else claiming that they open RAN, they've yet to open up their radio to a base panel-like Mavenir. There's no other market which gets to this sort of scale. If we prove this in India, with the cost structure that India has and the scale that India has, the feature set that India requires, which is not just 5G, it's 4G, it's 2G technology as well, then it can work in any market globally.
When you think of the Nokia claims or somebody else claiming that they open RAN, they've yet to open up their radio to a base panel-like Mavenir. There's no other market which gets to this sort of scale. If we prove this in India, with the cost structure that India has and the scale that India has, the feature set that India requires, which is not just 5G, it's 4G, it's 2G technology as well, then it can work in any market globally.