独家
电信公司猛烈抨击奥特,称之为“搭便车者”
印度手机运营商协会的评论(COAI),这代表了顶级电信运营商,前一天,宽带印度论坛(BIF),代表科技公司表示,奥特球员不是搭便车者,平台负责70%以上的电信流量,否则电信公司的网络就一直闲置。
新德里消息:印度顶尖的电信公司周四抨击应用程序制造商的投资又称他们“搭便车者”,并表示这些平台使用电信运营商的货币化服务的消费群体和赚取大量利润/好处。
的言论印度手机运营商协会(COAI),它代表了顶级电信公司,一天后宽带印度论坛(BIF),代表科技公司表示,奥特球员不是搭便车者,平台负责70%以上的电信流量,否则电信公司的网络就一直闲置。
BIF也表示,对于电信公司希望奥特支付网络基础设施、电信企业也应该支付应用程序制造商使用他们的基础设施。
然而,COAI反击BIF。
“电信服务提供商(tsp)贡献了一笔大约17627卢比对执照费和7073卢比往下(频谱使用费用)2021财年仅- 22,“COAI在一份声明中说。
除此之外,电信公司庞大的数量对光谱采集和网络基础设施的投资。“奥特,另一方面,零或微不足道的贡献政府尽管他们强劲的收入,“COAI说。
的行业身体强调沟通奥特不会导致国库税收的形式,征收执照费,等他们不是目前的监管交通部,虽然他们的服务类似于电信公司所提供。“因此,奥特通信服务的定义需要明确纳入电信法本身,”它补充道。
关于奥特投资数据中心、海底电缆等COAI说印度的运营商也投入巨资在铺设海底电缆建立国际网络连接。
关于网络中立问题的奥特支付电信公司,COAI说航空公司可以提供带宽提高应用和节流/阻止他们的服务选择节省带宽,由于条件铭刻在他们的执照。
此外,记住需要培养创业和男男奥特生态系统,COAI还建议,这种较低的玩家使用不需要要求支付使用费用,以帮助他们成长。
的言论印度手机运营商协会(COAI),它代表了顶级电信公司,一天后宽带印度论坛(BIF),代表科技公司表示,奥特球员不是搭便车者,平台负责70%以上的电信流量,否则电信公司的网络就一直闲置。
BIF也表示,对于电信公司希望奥特支付网络基础设施、电信企业也应该支付应用程序制造商使用他们的基础设施。
“电信服务提供商(tsp)贡献了一笔大约17627卢比对执照费和7073卢比往下(频谱使用费用)2021财年仅- 22,“COAI在一份声明中说。
除此之外,电信公司庞大的数量对光谱采集和网络基础设施的投资。“奥特,另一方面,零或微不足道的贡献政府尽管他们强劲的收入,“COAI说。
的行业身体强调沟通奥特不会导致国库税收的形式,征收执照费,等他们不是目前的监管交通部,虽然他们的服务类似于电信公司所提供。“因此,奥特通信服务的定义需要明确纳入电信法本身,”它补充道。
应用程序制造商现在说电信公司需要使用网络共享收入数据
“电信公司欠他们的基础设施利用率奥特,确实应该感谢他们。否则,他们的网络仍然永远闲置,”BIF说在一封给电信部(点)部长K拉。
关于奥特投资数据中心、海底电缆等COAI说印度的运营商也投入巨资在铺设海底电缆建立国际网络连接。
此外,记住需要培养创业和男男奥特生态系统,COAI还建议,这种较低的玩家使用不需要要求支付使用费用,以帮助他们成长。
New Delhi: India<\/a>\u2019s top telcos Thursday hit out at app makers, again calling them \u201cfree riders\u201d and said these platforms use telecom operators\u2019 consumer base for monetising their services and earn massive profits\/benefits.
The comments from Cellular Operators Association of India<\/a> (COAI<\/a>), which represent the top telcos, came a day after the Broadband India Forum<\/a> (BIF<\/a>), representing tech companies, said that OTT players are not free riders and the platforms are responsible for more than 70% of the telco traffic, failing which the networks of telcos would have remained unutilized.
BIF has also said that in case telcos want OTTs to pay for network infrastructure, telecom firms should also pay app makers for using their infrastructure.
The comments from Cellular Operators Association of India<\/a> (COAI<\/a>), which represent the top telcos, came a day after the Broadband India Forum<\/a> (BIF<\/a>), representing tech companies, said that OTT players are not free riders and the platforms are responsible for more than 70% of the telco traffic, failing which the networks of telcos would have remained unutilized.
BIF has also said that in case telcos want OTTs to pay for network infrastructure, telecom firms should also pay app makers for using their infrastructure.
<\/div><\/div>However, COAI has countered BIF.
\u201cTelecom service providers (TSPs) have contributed an amount of approx Rs 17,627 crore towards licence fee and Rs 7,073 crore towards SUC<\/a> (spectrum usage charge) for FY 2021-22 alone,\u201d COAI said in a statement.
Apart from that, telcos invest mammoth amounts towards spectrum acquisition and network infrastructure. \u201cOTTs, on the other hand, have nil or very miniscule contributions to the government despite their robust revenues,\u201d COAI said.
The industry<\/a> body stressed that communication OTTs do not contribute to the exchequer in the form of taxes, levies, licence fees, etc as they are not presently regulated by the ministry of communications<\/a>, although their services are similar to what telcos are providing. \u201cHence, the definition of OTT communication services need to be clearly incorporated in the Telecommunication Act itself,\u201d it added.
\u201cTelecom service providers (TSPs) have contributed an amount of approx Rs 17,627 crore towards licence fee and Rs 7,073 crore towards SUC<\/a> (spectrum usage charge) for FY 2021-22 alone,\u201d COAI said in a statement.
Apart from that, telcos invest mammoth amounts towards spectrum acquisition and network infrastructure. \u201cOTTs, on the other hand, have nil or very miniscule contributions to the government despite their robust revenues,\u201d COAI said.
The industry<\/a> body stressed that communication OTTs do not contribute to the exchequer in the form of taxes, levies, licence fees, etc as they are not presently regulated by the ministry of communications<\/a>, although their services are similar to what telcos are providing. \u201cHence, the definition of OTT communication services need to be clearly incorporated in the Telecommunication Act itself,\u201d it added.
![](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>