独家
数据保护草案被收紧,明年可能达到的房子
这一最新版本的法案,在2017年首次提出,目前政府内部传阅,并寻求法律意见,消息人士说。根据反馈,正在收紧,而某些方面有些“解释性”增加,上述引用的官员说。
这一最新版本的法案,在2017年首次提出,目前政府内部传阅,并寻求法律意见,消息人士说。根据反馈,正在收紧,而某些方面有些“解释性”增加,上述引用的官员说。
极其严重的这一最新草案作为一个全新的版本,一位高级官员说,因此,必须再次引用了国会联合委员会(JCP)。“任何新的法律,在一个行业带来全新的规定,必须一定是指议会委员会的观点,”这个人说,他指出,在政府”是一种标准实践。“PDP法案首次在2019年的议会选举中,被称为一个JCP,审议了接近两年前在2021年12月提交报告。
全面的法律框架的
“在敏感的个人信息的情况下,规定不能含糊不清的其他数据,如健康和医疗记录,税收和收入记录。新法案将定义和概述金融和刑法明确规定在违约的情况下,”一位官员表示引用。
8月,电子和信息技术(MeitY)退出议会法案的早期版本引用过时,条例草案已经在做了五年了。取而代之,政府表示,它将引入一个“全面的法律框架”迎合蓬勃发展的数据驱动技术和创业生态系统。
撤军后,部长Ashwini Vaishnaw告诉等,个人数据保护法案不得不下架了,2019年,有81的建议修改,除了其它12个建议改变规定。数据安全的核心原则,隐私权和其他人来说,概述了在旧的法案,新法案将保持不变,他说。
印度决定撤回该法案,取而代之的是新的立法受到了广泛认可。
“新的数据保护法案可能在冬季会议提出的
个人数据保护法案,2019年8月3日被撤回后,81年国会联合委员会寻求改变和12“重大建议”。
更多的延迟?
然而,一些隐私专家表示担忧,引用最新版本的法案,国会联合委员会再次将意味着进一步推迟制定立法,尽管别人认为,该法案是“技术上细致入微,”发送给JCP将“意义”。
“政府需要确保它邀请评论从学术界、研究人员和专家,“Kazim Rizvi说,公众的创始人政策智库的对话。“他们(中国)将有一个长时间的磋商,也许JCP能够定义的时间把它包起来,说,三到六个月。上一次,也是由于Covid推迟了。”
MeitY第一组成一个委员会,2017年退休的最高法院法官BN Srikrishna为首,故意在数据隐私法案的框架。该委员会提交了一份草案和报告在2018年,政府提出在2019年的议会。
等报道说,欧洲数据保护委员会委托进行的一项研究称印度的数据政策——具体来说,豁免法案的政府在35节——作为一个值得关注的领域。
2022年,美国贸易和科技机构部门官员会晤,表达了他们的担忧PDP法案的规定,包括那些在本地存储的数据。
![\"Data](\"https:\/\/st.etb2bimg.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
<\/figure>New Delhi: The Centre is preparing to release a revised draft of the Personal Data Protection<\/a> (PDP) Bill for public consultation later this month or in early November, according to top officials, who expect the bill to be finally introduced to lawmakers during the budget session of Parliament in early 2023.This latest version of the bill \u2014 first mooted in 2017 \u2014 is currently being circulated within the government, and legal opinion has been sought, sources said. Based on feedback, certain aspects are being \u201ctightened,\u201d while some \u201cexplanatory\u201d additions are being made, said an official cited above.
Terming this latest draft as a completely new version, a senior official said it will, therefore, have to be again referred to a Joint Committee of Parliament (JCP). \u201cAny new law, which brings in completely new regulations in a sector, has to necessarily be referred to the Committee of Parliament for its view,\u201d the person said, noting that it \u201cis a standard practice in government.\u201d The PDP Bill<\/a>, which was first introduced in Parliament in 2019, was then referred to a JCP that deliberated on it for close to two years before submitting its report in December 2021.
<\/div><\/div>\u201cThere were certain provisions in the previous bill that had to be explained better,\u201d said one of the officials cited above.
\u2018Comprehensive Legal Framework\u2019<\/strong>
\u201cIn the case of sensitive personal data, provisions cannot be vague about data such as health and other medical records, tax and income records. The new bill will define and outline the financial and penal provisions very clearly in cases of breach,\u201d said one of the officials cited earlier.
In August, the ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) withdrew the earlier version of the bill from Parliament citing obsolescence, as the draft regulation had been in the making for five years. In its place, the government had said it would introduce a \u201ccomprehensive legal framework\u201d to cater to the booming data-driven technology and startup ecosystem.
Following the withdrawal, IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw<\/a> told ET that the Personal Data Protection Bill<\/a>, 2019, had to be withdrawn as there were 81 suggestions for amendments, apart from 12 other suggestions for changes in its provisions. The core principles of data safety, right to privacy and others, outlined in the old bill, will remain intact in the new legislation, he had stated.
\u2018Comprehensive Legal Framework\u2019<\/strong>
\u201cIn the case of sensitive personal data, provisions cannot be vague about data such as health and other medical records, tax and income records. The new bill will define and outline the financial and penal provisions very clearly in cases of breach,\u201d said one of the officials cited earlier.
In August, the ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) withdrew the earlier version of the bill from Parliament citing obsolescence, as the draft regulation had been in the making for five years. In its place, the government had said it would introduce a \u201ccomprehensive legal framework\u201d to cater to the booming data-driven technology and startup ecosystem.
Following the withdrawal, IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw<\/a> told ET that the Personal Data Protection Bill<\/a>, 2019, had to be withdrawn as there were 81 suggestions for amendments, apart from 12 other suggestions for changes in its provisions. The core principles of data safety, right to privacy and others, outlined in the old bill, will remain intact in the new legislation, he had stated.
<\/div><\/div>A wide swathe of the global and local technology industry, as well as the governments of the US and some European nations, had criticised parts of that version of the bill. Their objections were centred on specific provisions pertaining to data localisation, classifying social media firms as publishers, inclusion of non-personal data in the Personal Data Protection Bill<\/a>, as well as certain exemptions for the government.
India\u2019s decision to withdraw the bill and replace it with a fresh legislation was met with widespread approval.
India\u2019s decision to withdraw the bill and replace it with a fresh legislation was met with widespread approval.