Tele-Talk新鲜的花,深入分析和观点从受人尊敬的行业领导者

5 g:电信运营商可能会收取公平保费,不进入激烈的战争

“电信技术将继续发展,我们开始听到5 g的出现,在我看来是提供带宽网络连接24 X 7”Brijendra K Syngal说高级本金,Dua咨询。

Brijendra K Syngal
Brijendra K Syngal 高级本金,Dua咨询

Be that as it may. In the past 5 years, the structure of the Indian telecommunications industry and in particular the mobile segment has seen a big change. Looking back to 2015, prior to the entry of Reliance Jio, the Telecommunications Service Providers were showing signs of being stretched for finances, and investment in continuing to build out their networks with newer technologies such as 4G, to be able to keep pace with the potential demands. 2G bloodbath had sucked in investable finances in canceled licenses. Discussions were already happening around mergers and acquisitions. This had a knock-on effect on offering the Indian consumer a true mobile broadband experience, a step-change in offerings to a large mobile customer base, but something that 3G failed to achieve, thereby the industry lost the opportunity to capitalise on that with a potential to increase ARPU. There was anticipation that 2016 was going to witness the beginning of mega consolidation in the Indian telecom sector. To unsettle an already ailing sector, Reliance Jio came into the market with a 4G mobile broadband offering and a mandate to scoop up as many customers as possible in a short space of time, due largely because of strong regulatory tailwinds, especially low spectrum charge, free trials, etc.

The Threat of New Entrants, one of the forces in Porter\u2019s Five Forces industry analysis framework, refers to the threat that new competitors pose to current players within an industry. The Threat of New Entrants exerts a significant influence on the ability of current companies to generate a profit. When new competitors enter into an industry offering the same products or services, the other companies competitive position will be at risk. There are barriers to entry such as brand loyalty, Cost advantages, Government regulations, Capital requirement, etc. In the case of Reliance Jio most of these barriers to entry did not seem to have an impact for obvious reasons.

To combat the competition triggered by Reliance Jio, the consolidations in the telecom sector should have led to the pooling of vital resources and infrastructure, which one hoped would have led to better service quality and customer experience for consumers and a justification to increase ARPU in certain segments of the consumer base, alas not. Therefore, I see the industry divided into 3 strata \u2013 established operators (Airtel, Vodafone-Idea), weak players (BSNL\/MTNL), and a challenger (Jio ). The challenger has redefined the technological and strategic landscape of the telecom sector.

The impact of Reliance Jio\u2019s entry has not only changed the competitive landscape but there have been other negatives effects too. As always, the losers are those in rural India. I believe the urban-rural divide has increased and the mantra of Digital India has fallen by the wayside. With the industry in turmoil, the contributions to the Universal Service Obligation Fund are on the way down, the crippling blow by the hangover from the AGR controversy is unlikely to see the USOF benefitting. To my mind the Supreme Court Judgement is bad in law by declaring the industry as wilful defaulters, forcing industry to pay for the flawed judicial system. Does anyone see the private companies benefitting the common man as opposed to worrying about how to get back their profits? Can the government-backed Service Providers step in when you look at their own financial woes? The government-backed service providers are in a COMA. Growth in rural teledensity has been stagnated in comparison to urban teledensity.

Telecommunications technology will continue to develop and we are starting to hear about the emergence of 5G, which to my mind is delivering bandwidth with internet connectivity 24 X 7. 5G is a different ball game, no cousin of 4G. Regulation permitted, 5G has the potential to see new, disruptive players entering the market in smart cities, IoT devices, and private networks. 5G will be a game of internet-connected devices for a plethora of service offerings. All these new players will also require a spectrum, driving innovation in regulation and allocation. We may need to look at regulating bands of spectrums to be available through shared and priority Access, and to be dedicated to enterprise applications. Telcos will need to evolve to open cloud networks, network sharing, network slicing and new spectrum to attain the cost structures, agility, and innovation to compete in 5G bandwidth delivery either via wireless or fiber. Only the most astute, who choose technology will succeed. Fair, stable regulation and policy will be the differentiator.

Learning from past mistakes, Indian Telcos should start to think about charging a fair premium for 5G services, not to enter into internecine wars. The fixed broadband world has offered speed-based pricing for some time and 5G enhanced mobile broadband does offer considerable improvements in network speeds and capacity. It is time to start to prepare the Indian consumer to pay more for the best connectivity. This will be especially true of operators looking to offer converged mobile broadband, and fixed wireless and or fiber access connectivity in a 5G age.

","blog_img":"","posted_date":"2020-05-12 10:46:21","modified_date":"2020-05-12 10:46:52","featured":"0","status":"Y","seo_title":"5G: Telcos may charge a fair premium, not to enter into fierce war","seo_url":"5g-telcos-may-charge-a-fair-premium-not-to-enter-into-fierce-war","url":"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/tele-talk\/5g-telcos-may-charge-a-fair-premium-not-to-enter-into-fierce-war\/4256","url_seo":"5g-telcos-may-charge-a-fair-premium-not-to-enter-into-fierce-war"}">
混乱是你的名称或在印度电信无处不在行业,尤其是在手机业务。诉讼是最好一个字描述。每次,和平与平静似乎解决,冲突开始非常类似于在我们的边境爆发。奇怪的是,总有一个工业的房子,这是闹得满城风雨的事件,2001年开始有限的迁移完全迁移,2007 +的组合技术在伪公司成群结队的许可证申请,导致臭名昭著的2 g骗局,并再次Jio的最新条目,后门条目将光谱数据转换成声音的未来技术LTE的名字。天掌权的政府也不,没有留下任何死角打破了火车的建议的玩家数量和分配频谱的时间测试e-ascending拍卖。球员们从6增加在2007年到2003年的14,现在到4(最小表面的竞争)

尽管如此。过去5年,印度电信行业的结构,特别是移动领域发生了巨大的变化。回顾2015年,进入之前依赖Jio,电信服务提供商的迹象被延伸了财务状况,和继续建设投资与新技术如4 g网络,能够跟上的潜在需求。2 g大屠杀吸入可投资资金在取消许可证。讨论已经在并购发生。这个连锁的影响提供印度消费者真正的移动宽带的经验,逐步改变所提供的产品,一个大移动客户群,但3 g的东西未能实现,因此该行业失去了机会与潜在的利用,提高ARPU。有预期,2016年将见证大型印度电信行业的整合的开始。来扰乱已经摇摇欲坠的部门,依赖Jio走进市场,4 g移动宽带提供并授权独家尽可能多的客户在很短的时间,由于主要是因为强大的监管顺风,尤其是低频谱,免费试用等。

新进入者的威胁,一个部队在波特的五种力量行业分析框架,新的竞争者构成的威胁是指当前的球员在一个行业。新进入者的威胁施加重大影响当前的公司产生利润的能力。当新的竞争对手进入一个行业提供相同的产品或服务,其他公司竞争地位将面临风险。有品牌忠诚度等进入壁垒,成本优势,政府规定,资本金要求等。对于依赖Jio这些门槛似乎并没有明显原因产生影响。

战斗信实Jio引发的竞争,电信部门的合并应该导致至关重要的资源和基础设施的池,希望哪一个将会导致更好的服务质量和客户体验为消费者和理由提高ARPU细分的消费者基础,唉。因此,我看到了行业分为3层,建立操作符(附近的旅馆Vodafone-Idea),薄弱的球员(BSNL / MTNL),和一个挑战者(Jio)。挑战者已经重新定义了技术和电信部门的战略格局。

的影响依赖Jio的加入不仅改变了竞争格局也有其他的消极影响。一如既往,失败者是那些在印度农村。我相信城乡差别和咒语的数字增加了印度已无人问津了。行业动荡,贡献普遍服务义务基金正在下降,严重打击的后遗症的AGR争议不大可能看到USOF获益。我认为最高法院审判是不好的在法律行业通过声明故意违约者,迫使行业支付的有缺陷的司法系统。有人看到私营企业中普通人而不是担心如何回到他们的利润?可以当你的政府支持的服务提供商一步看看自己的金融危机吗?政府支持的服务供应商是处于昏迷状态。农村电话密度的增长已经停滞相比城市电话密度。

通信技术将继续发展,我们开始听到5 g的出现,在我看来是提供24 x7带宽与互联网连接。5 g是一个不同的球的游戏,没有4 g的表弟。规定允许,5 g有可能看到新的颠覆性的球员在智能城市进入市场,物联网设备,和私人网络。5 g将游戏的联网设备上大量的服务产品。所有这些新球员也将需要一个光谱,推动创新的监管和分配。我们可能需要看看调节带的光谱可以通过共享和优先级访问,并致力于企业应用程序。电信公司需要发展开放云网络、网络共享、网络切片和新的频谱达到成本结构、敏捷性和创新竞争5 g带宽交付通过无线或纤维。只有最精明的,选择技术将取得成功。公平、稳定的监管和政策将微分器。

从过去的错误中学习,印度电信公司应该开始思考公平对5 g服务,收费不进入两败俱伤的战争。固定宽带世界提供了摘要定价在一段时间内,5 g增强移动宽带网络的确提供了相当大的改善速度和容量。是时候开始准备印度消费者花更多的钱购买最好的连通性。尤其如此运营商提供融合移动宽带,和固定无线和或纤维访问连接在5 g时代。

免责声明:作者的观点仅和ETTelecom.com不一定订阅它。乐动体育1002乐动体育乐动娱乐招聘乐动娱乐招聘乐动体育1002乐动体育ETTelecom.com不得负责任何损害任何个人/组织直接或间接造成的。


Be that as it may. In the past 5 years, the structure of the Indian telecommunications industry and in particular the mobile segment has seen a big change. Looking back to 2015, prior to the entry of Reliance Jio, the Telecommunications Service Providers were showing signs of being stretched for finances, and investment in continuing to build out their networks with newer technologies such as 4G, to be able to keep pace with the potential demands. 2G bloodbath had sucked in investable finances in canceled licenses. Discussions were already happening around mergers and acquisitions. This had a knock-on effect on offering the Indian consumer a true mobile broadband experience, a step-change in offerings to a large mobile customer base, but something that 3G failed to achieve, thereby the industry lost the opportunity to capitalise on that with a potential to increase ARPU. There was anticipation that 2016 was going to witness the beginning of mega consolidation in the Indian telecom sector. To unsettle an already ailing sector, Reliance Jio came into the market with a 4G mobile broadband offering and a mandate to scoop up as many customers as possible in a short space of time, due largely because of strong regulatory tailwinds, especially low spectrum charge, free trials, etc.

The Threat of New Entrants, one of the forces in Porter\u2019s Five Forces industry analysis framework, refers to the threat that new competitors pose to current players within an industry. The Threat of New Entrants exerts a significant influence on the ability of current companies to generate a profit. When new competitors enter into an industry offering the same products or services, the other companies competitive position will be at risk. There are barriers to entry such as brand loyalty, Cost advantages, Government regulations, Capital requirement, etc. In the case of Reliance Jio most of these barriers to entry did not seem to have an impact for obvious reasons.

To combat the competition triggered by Reliance Jio, the consolidations in the telecom sector should have led to the pooling of vital resources and infrastructure, which one hoped would have led to better service quality and customer experience for consumers and a justification to increase ARPU in certain segments of the consumer base, alas not. Therefore, I see the industry divided into 3 strata \u2013 established operators (Airtel, Vodafone-Idea), weak players (BSNL\/MTNL), and a challenger (Jio ). The challenger has redefined the technological and strategic landscape of the telecom sector.

The impact of Reliance Jio\u2019s entry has not only changed the competitive landscape but there have been other negatives effects too. As always, the losers are those in rural India. I believe the urban-rural divide has increased and the mantra of Digital India has fallen by the wayside. With the industry in turmoil, the contributions to the Universal Service Obligation Fund are on the way down, the crippling blow by the hangover from the AGR controversy is unlikely to see the USOF benefitting. To my mind the Supreme Court Judgement is bad in law by declaring the industry as wilful defaulters, forcing industry to pay for the flawed judicial system. Does anyone see the private companies benefitting the common man as opposed to worrying about how to get back their profits? Can the government-backed Service Providers step in when you look at their own financial woes? The government-backed service providers are in a COMA. Growth in rural teledensity has been stagnated in comparison to urban teledensity.

Telecommunications technology will continue to develop and we are starting to hear about the emergence of 5G, which to my mind is delivering bandwidth with internet connectivity 24 X 7. 5G is a different ball game, no cousin of 4G. Regulation permitted, 5G has the potential to see new, disruptive players entering the market in smart cities, IoT devices, and private networks. 5G will be a game of internet-connected devices for a plethora of service offerings. All these new players will also require a spectrum, driving innovation in regulation and allocation. We may need to look at regulating bands of spectrums to be available through shared and priority Access, and to be dedicated to enterprise applications. Telcos will need to evolve to open cloud networks, network sharing, network slicing and new spectrum to attain the cost structures, agility, and innovation to compete in 5G bandwidth delivery either via wireless or fiber. Only the most astute, who choose technology will succeed. Fair, stable regulation and policy will be the differentiator.

Learning from past mistakes, Indian Telcos should start to think about charging a fair premium for 5G services, not to enter into internecine wars. The fixed broadband world has offered speed-based pricing for some time and 5G enhanced mobile broadband does offer considerable improvements in network speeds and capacity. It is time to start to prepare the Indian consumer to pay more for the best connectivity. This will be especially true of operators looking to offer converged mobile broadband, and fixed wireless and or fiber access connectivity in a 5G age.

","blog_img":"","posted_date":"2020-05-12 10:46:21","modified_date":"2020-05-12 10:46:52","featured":"0","status":"Y","seo_title":"5G: Telcos may charge a fair premium, not to enter into fierce war","seo_url":"5g-telcos-may-charge-a-fair-premium-not-to-enter-into-fierce-war","url":"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/tele-talk\/5g-telcos-may-charge-a-fair-premium-not-to-enter-into-fierce-war\/4256","url_seo":"5g-telcos-may-charge-a-fair-premium-not-to-enter-into-fierce-war"},img_object:["","retail_files/author_1589259896_75661.jpg"],fromNewsletter:"",newsletterDate:"",ajaxParams:{action:"get_more_blogs"},pageTrackingKey:"Blog",author_list:"Brijendra K Syngal",complete_cat_name:"Blogs"});" data-jsinvoker_init="_override_history_url = "//www.iser-br.com/tele-talk/5g-telcos-may-charge-a-fair-premium-not-to-enter-into-fierce-war/4256";">