Kolkata: Former officials of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (Trai) and the Department of Telecommunications<\/a> (DoT) have said if the draft telecom bill<\/a> in its current form becomes law, it could further dilute the sector regulator’s powers.

Such a scenario, they cautioned, could potentially weaken the regulatory environment, lead to greater government interference in
policy<\/a> making, hurt consumer interests and even lead to a decline in quality of telecom services.

“Trai’s regulatory powers are already far less than those of
Ofcom<\/a> and other global counterparts in the US, Europe or even in Pakistan, and if the draft telecom bill<\/a> leads to a further curtailment of its powers, it would be a retrograde step as a toothless telecom regulator would not be in the interest of consumers or the industry and would also impact investor confidence in future,” Sudhir Gupta<\/a>, former Trai secretary, told ET.

He added that a weak regulator would be detrimental to consumer interests, going forward, as it won’t be able to ensure either fairness in tariff regulation or enforce quality of service parameters effectively even as India prepares to go 5G from next month.

\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>
Big tech companies have already voiced their misgivings about the draft
telecom bill<\/a>, saying it threatens to rob the regulator of its statutory independence and make it subservient to the government. This is since the draft bill calls for deleting provisions around regulatory safeguards under Section 11 (1) of the Trai Act<\/a> that enable proper checks and balances. The bill seeks to reduce Trai’s powers from a regulatory to just a recommendatory body.

Ram Narain<\/a>, a former senior DDG (security) in DoT, said the government should ideally take steps to further empower<\/a> Trai rather than curbing its powers as it would minimise interference, lead to more holistic policy<\/a> making and ensure a stabler regulatory environment in the sector.

He, though, strongly underlined the need for a seasoned telecoms professional to lead Trai. “It’s important that Trai’s chairperson is an experienced telecom professional with high integrity, and that the members assisting him in regulatory work also have deep domain knowledge, if Trai is to truly function as an independent telecom regulator,” he said.

Narain, in fact, said if Trai is not led by a telecom professional, it may be unable to function effectively as a regulator, and from that perspective, DoT may do a better job in the near term as it has parliamentary oversight and would be more accountable for its actions.

A top executive of a Big 3 telco, though, said any move to clip the Trai's wings is bad for both the industry and consumers, particularly from a mobile services perspective. \"It will undermine the sanctity of telecom regulation, which could have grave consequences for the industry since Trai, in its current role of independent regulator, is responsible for ensuring a level-playing field in the sector, protecting consumer interests and ensuring fairness and transparency in tariff determination,\" he said.

Separately, analysts expect the
draft telecom bill<\/a> to pave the way for more relief to Vodafone Idea<\/a> (Vi) as it allows the government to partially or fully write-off or defer dues in cases of payment defaults in extraordinary circumstances.

“The bill allows the government to provide relief via partial\/full write-off or deferment of dues or conversion into shares in cases of payment default in extraordinary circumstances... This could be positive for Vi if the government decides to waive some of its dues in future,”
JM Financial<\/a> said in a note.

<\/p>
\"Broadband<\/a><\/figure>

Broadband body: Telecom bill hurts Trai independence, OTT move to hit innovation<\/a><\/h2>

The Broadband India Forum (BIF), which counts tech biggies such as Tata Consultancy Services, Cisco, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Facebook-owner Meta, Qualcomm, OneWeb and Hughes among its key members, is also dismayed by the draft telecom bill’s goal of bringing OTT players within the ambit of telecom law and licensing.<\/p><\/div>

Kolkata: Former officials of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/a> (Trai) and the Department of Telecommunications<\/a> (DoT) have said if the draft telecom bill<\/a> in its current form becomes law, it could further dilute the sector regulator’s powers.

Such a scenario, they cautioned, could potentially weaken the regulatory environment, lead to greater government interference in
policy<\/a> making, hurt consumer interests and even lead to a decline in quality of telecom services.

“Trai’s regulatory powers are already far less than those of
Ofcom<\/a> and other global counterparts in the US, Europe or even in Pakistan, and if the draft telecom bill<\/a> leads to a further curtailment of its powers, it would be a retrograde step as a toothless telecom regulator would not be in the interest of consumers or the industry and would also impact investor confidence in future,” Sudhir Gupta<\/a>, former Trai secretary, told ET.

He added that a weak regulator would be detrimental to consumer interests, going forward, as it won’t be able to ensure either fairness in tariff regulation or enforce quality of service parameters effectively even as India prepares to go 5G from next month.

\"\"
<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>
Big tech companies have already voiced their misgivings about the draft
telecom bill<\/a>, saying it threatens to rob the regulator of its statutory independence and make it subservient to the government. This is since the draft bill calls for deleting provisions around regulatory safeguards under Section 11 (1) of the Trai Act<\/a> that enable proper checks and balances. The bill seeks to reduce Trai’s powers from a regulatory to just a recommendatory body.

Ram Narain<\/a>, a former senior DDG (security) in DoT, said the government should ideally take steps to further empower<\/a> Trai rather than curbing its powers as it would minimise interference, lead to more holistic policy<\/a> making and ensure a stabler regulatory environment in the sector.

He, though, strongly underlined the need for a seasoned telecoms professional to lead Trai. “It’s important that Trai’s chairperson is an experienced telecom professional with high integrity, and that the members assisting him in regulatory work also have deep domain knowledge, if Trai is to truly function as an independent telecom regulator,” he said.

Narain, in fact, said if Trai is not led by a telecom professional, it may be unable to function effectively as a regulator, and from that perspective, DoT may do a better job in the near term as it has parliamentary oversight and would be more accountable for its actions.

A top executive of a Big 3 telco, though, said any move to clip the Trai's wings is bad for both the industry and consumers, particularly from a mobile services perspective. \"It will undermine the sanctity of telecom regulation, which could have grave consequences for the industry since Trai, in its current role of independent regulator, is responsible for ensuring a level-playing field in the sector, protecting consumer interests and ensuring fairness and transparency in tariff determination,\" he said.

Separately, analysts expect the
draft telecom bill<\/a> to pave the way for more relief to Vodafone Idea<\/a> (Vi) as it allows the government to partially or fully write-off or defer dues in cases of payment defaults in extraordinary circumstances.

“The bill allows the government to provide relief via partial\/full write-off or deferment of dues or conversion into shares in cases of payment default in extraordinary circumstances... This could be positive for Vi if the government decides to waive some of its dues in future,”
JM Financial<\/a> said in a note.

<\/p>
\"Broadband<\/a><\/figure>

Broadband body: Telecom bill hurts Trai independence, OTT move to hit innovation<\/a><\/h2>

The Broadband India Forum (BIF), which counts tech biggies such as Tata Consultancy Services, Cisco, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Facebook-owner Meta, Qualcomm, OneWeb and Hughes among its key members, is also dismayed by the draft telecom bill’s goal of bringing OTT players within the ambit of telecom law and licensing.<\/p><\/div>