![\"\"](\"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
However, recently, the apex court had said that it was shocking that the judgment striking down the law has not been implemented even now.
The Ministry of Home Affairs<\/a> (MHA) has requested states and Union Territories<\/a> (UTs) to direct all police stations under their jurisdiction not to register cases under the repealed Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, a home ministry statement said.
The ministry said it has also asked the states and UTs to sensitise law enforcement agencies for the compliance of the order issued by the Supreme Court on March 24, 2015.
The MHA has also requested that if any case has been booked in states and UTs under section 66A of the IT Act, 2000, such cases should be immediately withdrawn.
The Supreme Court in its judgment on March 24, 2015 in the matter of Shreya Singhal Vs<\/a>. Union of India<\/a> had struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. This made Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 null and void with effect from the date of the order and hence no action could be taken under this section.
The section of the law provides police power to arrest a person for posting \"offensive\" content online and provides for a three-year jail term.
The Supreme Court early this month issued a notice to the Centre on the use of Section 66A of the IT Act and said that it was shocking that the judgment striking down the law has not been implemented even now.<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":84428969,"title":"India single largest source of government information requests: Twitter","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/india-single-largest-source-of-government-information-requests-twitter\/84428969","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"telecomnews"}],"related_content":[],"seoschemas":false,"msid":84429041,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"MHA asks states to order police not to register cases under scrapped section of IT Act","synopsis":"The Supreme Court in 2015 had struck down the controversial Section 66A of the IT Act that made posting \"offensive\" comments online a crime punishable by jail, after a long campaign by defenders of free speech.","titleseo":"telecomnews\/mha-asks-states-to-order-police-not-to-register-cases-under-scrapped-section-of-it-act","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"analytics":{"comments":0,"views":131,"shares":0,"engagementtimems":554000},"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"PTI","artdate":"2021-07-15 07:54:11","lastupd":"2021-07-15 07:56:50","breadcrumbTags":["Section 66A of the IT Act","Union Territories","Supreme Court","shreya singhal vs","information technology act","Union of India","ministry of home affairs","policy"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"telecomnews\/mha-asks-states-to-order-police-not-to-register-cases-under-scrapped-section-of-it-act"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="" data-category_id="" data-date="2021-07-15" data-index="article_1">
- Telecom乐动扑克News
- 2分钟阅读
尼古拉斯问国家秩序警察没有登记的情况下取消了部分行动
最高法院在2015年推翻了它的有争议的部分66年发表“不敬”,网上犯罪处以监禁,经过长时间的竞选言论自由的捍卫者。
读到
然而,最近,法院曾说,这是令人震惊的,判决驳回法律尚未实现。
的民政部门(尼古拉斯)请求的状态和联盟的领土(ut)直接辖所有警察局没有登记的情况下在66年废止部分信息技术法案》,2000年,内政部发表声明说。
卫生部表示,它还要求使敏感的各省和执法机构的合规顺序最高法院发布的3月24日,2015年。
尼古拉斯也要求如果任何情况下已经预定在各省和部分66年的法案,2000年,这种情况下应立即撤回。
最高法院的判决3月24日,2015年的的问题Shreya Singhal Vs。印度工会了信息技术法案的66节,2000年。这使得信息技术法案的66节,2000年无效由订单的日期,因此不可能采取任何行动在这个部分。
法律规定警察有权逮捕的部分一个人因在网上“进攻”内容,提供了一个为期三年的刑期。
最高法院本月初发布了一份通知中心的使用部分66的行为,说,这是令人震惊的,判决驳回法律尚未实现。
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动