![\"<p>FILE](\"\/\/www.iser-br.com\/Themes\/Release\/images\/responsive\/ettelecom-default.jpg\")
The U.S. solicitor general on Tuesday urged the U.S. Supreme Court to reject an appeal by Apple<\/a> Inc and Broadcom Inc stemming from their $1.1 billion trial loss to the California Institute of Technology in a patent infringement case.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was correct when it ruled last year that the companies could not seek to invalidate Caltech<\/a>'s patents in court after Apple failed to raise its invalidity arguments at the U.S. Patent Office.
Caltech declined to comment on the solicitor general's filing. Representatives for the companies and the solicitor general's office did not immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday.
Pasadena, California-based Caltech sued Apple and Broadcom in Los Angeles federal court in 2016, alleging millions of iPhones, iPads, Apple Watches and other devices with Broadcom Wi-Fi chips infringed its data-transmission patents.
Caltech has also sued Microsoft Corp<\/a>, Samsung Electronics<\/a> Co, Dell Technologies Inc<\/a> and HP Inc for infringing the same patents in separate cases that are still pending.
A jury in 2020 ordered Apple to pay Caltech $837.8 million and Broadcom to pay $270.2 million. The Federal Circuit took issue with the amount of the award and sent the case back last year for a new trial on damages, which is yet to be scheduled.
Apple and Broadcom had argued at the Federal Circuit that they should have been allowed to challenge the patents' validity at trial. The appeals court upheld the decision to bar the invalidity arguments because Apple previously could have raised them in its petitions for Patent Office review of the patents.
The companies told the justices that the Federal Circuit misread the law, which only bars arguments that could have been raised during the review itself.
Prelogar said in her Tuesday brief that the Federal Circuit interpreted the law correctly.
<\/body>","next_sibling":[{"msid":100488295,"title":"South Korea asks US to review China rule for chip subsidies","entity_type":"ARTICLE","link":"\/news\/devices\/south-korea-asks-us-to-review-china-rule-for-chip-subsidies\/100488295","category_name":null,"category_name_seo":"devices"}],"related_content":[],"msid":100488333,"entity_type":"ARTICLE","title":"Biden administration urges Supreme Court not to hear Apple-Caltech patent case","synopsis":"Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was correct when it ruled last year that the companies could not seek to invalidate Caltech's patents in court after Apple failed to raise its invalidity arguments at the U.S. Patent Office.","titleseo":"devices\/biden-administration-urges-supreme-court-not-to-hear-apple-caltech-patent-case","status":"ACTIVE","authors":[],"Alttitle":{"minfo":""},"artag":"Reuters","artdate":"2023-05-25 07:56:14","lastupd":"2023-05-25 07:57:49","breadcrumbTags":["Apple","microsoft corp","dell technologies inc","Apple Caltech case","Caltech","International","technology news","Samsung Electronics"],"secinfo":{"seolocation":"devices\/biden-administration-urges-supreme-court-not-to-hear-apple-caltech-patent-case"}}" data-authors="[" "]" data-category-name="Devices" data-category_id="12" data-date="2023-05-25" data-index="article_1">
- 设备
- 2分钟阅读
拜登政府敦促最高法院没有听到Apple-Caltech专利情况
副检察长伊丽莎白Prelogar说,美国联邦巡回上诉法院去年裁定时是正确的公司不能在法庭上寻求加州理工学院的专利失效后,苹果未能提高其在美国专利局无效参数。
美国副检察长周二敦促美国最高法院拒绝上诉苹果公司和博通公司源于他们的审判亏损11亿美元,加州理工学院的专利侵权案件。
副检察长伊丽莎白Prelogar说,美国联邦巡回上诉法院去年裁定时是正确的公司不能寻求无效加州理工学院在法庭上的专利后苹果未能提高其在美国专利局无效参数。
加州理工学院拒绝评论总检察长。代表公司和总检察长办公室周三没有立即回复记者的置评请求。
加州帕萨迪纳市加州理工学院在洛杉矶联邦法院起诉苹果和博通2016年,称数以百万计的iphone, ipad,苹果与Broadcom无线芯片手表和其他设备侵犯了其数据传输的专利。
加州理工学院也起诉微软(msft . o:行情),三星电子有限公司,戴尔技术公司和惠普公司侵犯同一专利在单独的情况下仍悬而未决。
陪审团要求苹果支付加州理工学院2020年的8.378亿美元和博通支付2.702亿美元。联邦巡回法院对该奖项的数量并将此案发回去年新审判赔偿,这是有待安排。
苹果和博通在联邦巡回法院认为他们应该被允许挑战专利的有效性试验。上诉法院维持决定栏无效的参数,因为苹果以前可以提高他们在专利局审查专利的请愿书。
公司告诉联邦巡回法院的法官误解了法律,只有酒吧参数,可以提高在审查本身。
Prelogar说周二在她短暂,联邦巡回法院解释法律正确。
评论
现在评论 阅读评论(1)所有评论
找到这个评论进攻?
下面选择你的理由并单击submit按钮。这将提醒我们的版主采取行动