独家

社交媒体公司100%的政府内容块的请求

虽然活动家,反对派经常指责政府使用条款的钳制言论自由和言论自由,政府总是击落这些指控,称旨在阻止订单减少非法谈话,可能导致公共秩序混乱或威胁国家的主权。

新德里:有“100%合规”与内容阻塞请求的状态在第69节它的行为,也许第一个实例社交媒体巨人如推特,脸谱网,Instagram,YouTube,谷歌下降符合政府的要求。

尽管一些悬而未决的案件法院提起的公司——尤其是Twitter去年7月去了卡纳塔克邦HC对据称是不成比例的使用国家权力——没有抵抗请求块内容和潜在影响国家安全、主权和公共秩序。这也源于政府加强监管机制在非法内容,并使公司任命官员调查用户和政府请求根据新的指导方针。

政府每月发送的500 - 600个请求阻止在线内容

虽然活动人士和反对党政客经常指责政府使用条款的钳制言论自由和言论自由,政府一直击落这些指控,称阻止订单只有旨在减少“非法”对话,可能会导致公共秩序混乱或威胁的主权国家。

“更广泛的协议需要控制谈话,有损国家、或公共秩序。我们发送的请求根据第69节通常被坚持。我们通常发送500 - 600请求每个月,和没有任何悬而未决,“顶级人士告诉钢铁洪流。

和平共处的当前状态是相去甚远的辛辣,如重复Twitter拒绝注意政府的请求阻止用户和账户在农民的抗议。虽然发出阻塞订单,政府已表示,它希望帐户被撤下,因为他们有可能创建公共秩序混乱,特别是在国家首都。

阻塞请求是由一个委员会后,与部门的代表,国内,法律,i b、,和其他关键机构,认为特定的用户帐户,或内容,需要删除。很多有关恐怖主义,查谟和克什米尔,仇恨言论来自巴基斯坦,甚至在这个国家。

“我们给予合理的订单,与公司在分歧的情况下,重复活动”。


遵循和联系我们,脸谱网,Linkedin,Youtube
NEW DELHI: There has been a \u201c100% compliance\u201d with content blocking requests made by the state under Section 69A of the IT Act<\/a>, marking perhaps the first instance of top social media<\/a> giants such as Twitter<\/a>, Facebook<\/a>, Instagram<\/a>, YouTube<\/a>, and Google<\/a> falling in line with the government\u2019s demands.

Notwithstanding a few pending cases in courts filed by companies \u2014 especially Twitter which went to the Karnataka HC last July over what it alleged was disproportionate use of power by the state \u2014 there has not been much resistance to requests to block content with potential impact on national security, sovereignty, and public order. This also comes after the government tightened the regulatory mechanism around illegal content, and made companies appoint officers to look into user and government requests under the new IT guidelines.

Govt sends \u2018500-600 requests\u2019 a month to block online content
<\/strong>
While activists and politicians from opposition parties have often accused governments of using the clause to muzzle \u201cfree speech and freedom of expression\u201d, the government has always shot down these allegations, saying the blocking orders were only aimed at curtailing \u201cillegal\u201d conversations that may cause public disorder or threaten the sovereignty of the nation.